Skip to content

Editorial Standards & Methodology

Last updated: May 5, 2026

Every article on MyBreedPick is produced under the editorial standards described on this page. We publish this methodology publicly because we want readers to know exactly how our content is researched, written, reviewed, and updated — and because we believe that transparency is a non-negotiable part of being a useful resource.

Our research process

Every breed profile begins with primary-source research. For dog breeds, that means the American Kennel Club (AKC) breed standard, the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) breed file when applicable, and the breed’s national parent club (e.g., the Golden Retriever Club of America, the German Shepherd Dog Club of America). For cat breeds, we consult The International Cat Association (TICA), the Cat Fanciers’ Association (CFA), and the Governing Council of the Cat Fancy (GCCF).

We supplement breed-club sources with peer-reviewed veterinary research, behavioral research from accredited universities, and reputable industry publications such as the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, the Journal of Veterinary Behavior, and the Veterinary Record. Sources used are listed at the bottom of each breed profile.

What we publish — and what we don’t

MyBreedPick publishes:

MyBreedPick does not publish:

How content is reviewed

Every breed profile and decision guide is reviewed by Kayla Mulkey, lead editor, before publication. The review checks: source accuracy, attribution completeness, factual claims against primary sources, balance in temperament descriptions (avoiding breed promotion or breed dismissal), and clarity for the reader trying to make an actual decision.

Content involving health considerations is reviewed against a stricter standard: claims must be sourced to peer-reviewed research or breed-club health statements, and the article must clearly direct readers to a veterinarian for individual decisions.

How often content is updated

Each breed profile carries a “last reviewed” date visible at the top of the article. We re-review breed profiles at least once every 12 months, and sooner when a breed-club standard, AKC ranking, or significant health research changes.

Decision guides (“best breed for apartment living”, “best dog for first-time owners”) are reviewed quarterly to reflect updated breed availability, pricing, and reader feedback.

Corrections policy

If you spot a factual error on MyBreedPick, please tell us. We take corrections seriously. Substantive corrections are noted at the bottom of the corrected article with the date and a brief description of what changed. Typos and minor edits are made silently.

Use of AI in our content production

MyBreedPick uses AI tools as part of our research and drafting workflow. Specifically, we use large language models to help structure research notes, draft initial article outlines from cited sources, and check articles for clarity and consistency. Every article on this site is reviewed, edited, and approved by a human editor before publication. AI-assisted drafting does not replace primary-source research, editorial judgment, or fact-checking — it supports them.

We believe in being transparent about this. We don’t publish AI-generated content unattended; every article passes through editorial review against our standards.

Independence and integrity

MyBreedPick is an independent publication. We have no parent company, no commercial relationship with any breed club, kennel, breeder, or pet retailer, and no advertiser influence over our editorial decisions. Affiliate revenue is disclosed openly on every guide that uses affiliate links.

Questions about our standards, processes, or any specific article? Reach out.